Campaign for Age Of Consent awareness & removal of The Sodomy Law in QueenslandQueensland's Age Of Consent is 16 but anal intercourse is illegal under 18 (61K)

A community resource of accurate information, opinion and references regarding the discriminatory “Sodomy Law” which is Section 208 of the Queensland Criminal Code. This law places Australia among the worst nations in the world for the criminalisation of homosexual activity. 

Most recently updated, and all details true and correct, as at 17th August 2014. This public resource was established in 2001 by former community radio 4ZZZfm Brisbane “Queer Radio” program presenter & coordinator John Frame (see his full contact details) and is stored on his personal website www.queerradio.org . John continues to manage and edit all of this content, and to maintain the resource for community benefit, especially in support of those many youth who need to know that there are people of conscience who care strongly for their right to be treated with true equity under the law.

This page and the associated links constitute a detailed resource regarding the need for Equity in Age Of Consent and Legal Sexual Activity for the State of Queensland, Australia. This campaign commenced in March 2000, calling for removal of our state's 1990 “Sodomy Law” which defines anal sex (often presumed to define “homosexual sex”) as being a criminal activity for any person aged under 18, as well as for their sexual partner. The Courts do accept “Consent” as a defense. The Sodomy Law section of the Criminal Code provides absolutely no added protection for youth, and in fact it acts solely to reinforce homophobic oppression of same sex attracted male youth by tainting them as being likely criminals, while also obstructing the delivery of vital safe sex education. All evidence is that youth engage in sexual activity regardless of the law, and that male youths engage in sex more frequently, and at a younger age, than females do. The aim of seeking a truly equal age of consent at 16 is to enable equal legal protection, societal support and community acceptance of all youth - regardless of their gender or their sexual orientation. Since 2003 Queensland has been the only region in Australia without as truly equal age of consent. The age of consent is truly equal at 16 in New South Wales, Victoria, West Australia, the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory – and at 17 in Tasmania and South Australia.

Sadly even a few high profile Australian LGBT activists have carelessly made statements which perpetuate the myth that Australia no longer has any laws against homosexuality.  On 11th April 2014 Rodney Croome made such a statement in his article for “New Matilda” – and that same day I posted the following correction: This is a very fine article by Rodney Croome, however the second paragraph is only partly accurate in stating that Tasmania "was the last Australian state to criminalise homosexuality, which had a maximum penalty of 21 years in gaol." This is because Queensland definitely still criminalises homosexuality, by criminalising homosexual activity ("sodomy" - anal intercourse) with a maximum penalty of 14 years (not 21). The discriminatory "Sodomy Law", Section 208 of the Criminal Code, applies to 16 and 17 year olds who engage in "sodomy", as well as to any of their partners aged 18 or over. "Consent" is not accepted as a defense in Court. If a school counsellor or principal is aware that one of their students of this age is involved in sodomy, then they are obliged by Queensland Education Department rules to report the matter directly to Police. The Australian public needs to be consistently reminded that our nation has not yet fixed all of its laws which criminalise homosexuality. The landmark Toonen vs Australia case was a key argument quoted by Queensland Anti-Discrimination Commissioner Susan Booth in her 15th July 2005 letter to Labor Attorney-General Rod Welford in which she called for reform of the Sodomy Law to allow the basic right of a truly equal age of consent. True equality in age of consent exists outside of Queensland at 17 in Tasmania and South Australia and at 16 elsewhere. The most recent jurisdictions to enact an equal age of consent were New South Wales and the Northern Territory in 2003, when they removed a higher minimum age of 18 for male to male sex.” 

 

All hope for equal age of consent reform in the near future effectively ended on 24th March 2012 when the Anna Bligh led Queensland Labor Party lost their majority and were reduced to a handful of seats in the new Parliament. Equal age of consent reform will simply not happen under a Liberal / National Party dominated government - as repeatedly confirmed by their Leaders, most recently John-Paul Langbroek.
Decriminalisation of sex between men in Queensland was a consequence of the 1989 Fitzgerald Report on its inquiry into official corruption. Homosexuality was a common factor in blackmail, vice and police brutality. The best Queensland Government in my lifetime was Labor under Wayne Goss - however they were the ones who, in November 1990, actually introduced the highly discriminatory Sodomy Law, which criminalised anal sex for any person aged under 18, which is 2 years higher than for all other sex acts. This law criminalises youth themselves – whether straight or gay – based on their personal choice of sexual activity. The unstated purpose of the law was to limit the likelihood of young men engaging in homosexual sex – and the unstated reasoning for it was based entirely in ignorance, religious bigotry and homophobia.
Goss Labor enacted the unequal age of consent against the specific PCJC Report recommendation that the age of consent be made truly equal at 16 when sex between men was decriminalised. Former Goss Labor Attorney-General Dean Wells confirmed to me in 2010 that this was done solely to placate a few of Labor’s own ultra-conservative MPs who were vigorously opposed to decriminalising sex between men. The only attempt Labor has ever made to undo the harm of the 1990 Sodomy Law was in their 1995 Revised Criminal Code, which included a truly equal age of consent at 16. However Labor lost their majority control of Parliament in 1996, just before the 1995 Revised Criminal Code Act would have taken effect, and one of the first actions by the incoming Liberal / National Coalition was that they repealed the 1995 Revised Criminal Code and reinstated the 1899 Code – but with aggressive amendments such as changing the terminology in Sections 208 and 209 from “anal intercourse” to the more offensive “sodomy”, and doubling the penalty to 14 years imprisonment (with up to 7 years for “attempting” sodomy). In October 2008 Bligh Labor had the opportunity to do away with the Sodomy Law but instead decided to make the law worse, by removing Section 209 (attempting Sodomy) and combining it with Section 208 – making the same penalty of 14 years imprisonment apply whether attempting or doing sodomy.  
I am hugely disappointed and frustrated by the deliberate repeated refusal by Labor Premiers Beattie and Bligh, and all of their Attorneys-General, to enact an equal age of consent in the 14 years of their administration's Parliamentary majority. Labor had a clear moral obligation to enact this reform - since at least the early 2000’s Queensland Labor’s Official Policy Platform included a specific commitment to ensure equity in laws relating to age of consent. There is no possible reasonable excuse for their inaction. They have knowingly condemned thousands of Queensland's youth to ongoing Government sanctioned bullying, discrimination, inadequate sex education, increased risk of HIV and other STD infection, and the increased risk of both self-harm and suicide.
I intend to maintain this website as a public resource in the hope that that it will empower and inform and make it easier for others who may wish to continue activism toward achieving equal age of consent reform. Please feel free to use this information for school or university projects, or for lobbying. Responsibility for pursuing this reform lies with every LGBT community group, community legal service and every person of conscience. I am happy to answer any queries and can be contacted on 07 3350 1562 or by email johnvframe@yahoo.com 
– John Frame 16th June 2014

what the law means...an easy to read pamphlet...a brief story of the campaign so far...homosexual law reform history in Qld...Government legislation referencesCorrespondence Summary List...  

Please note that throughout this document, and in any linked files, the "Queensland AIDS Council" and “Queensland Association for Healthy Communities” are names for the exact same group. The community funded group was established in 1984 as “The Queensland AIDS Council” and still uses that name today. Between June 2006 and late 2013 they were known as the “Queensland Association for Healthy Communities”. The Queensland AIDS Council website URL is www.quac.org.au .

A Change.org petition (click here for details) was opened 14 December 2011 and closed 28 January 2012. I decided to close this petition early, even though there were only 254 signatures, because in the previous week Premier Bligh had announced that the State election would be held on 24 March 2012 and that the Government will go into “caretaker” mode from 19 February. It would have been possible for the Government to officially start the reform process if they acted immediately. On 30 January 2012 I posted the complete petition to both Premier Bligh and Attorney-General Paul Lucas. The 12 page document includes a 3 page covering letter, which includes all of the reasons for signing which people had posted to the petition site. There was no response from the Premier or Attorney-General.

Click the following bookmarks to go to related details within this page:

- The Proposal for equal age of consent reform

- Main reasons for enacting a truly equal age of consent

- More reasons for enacting a truly equal age of consent

- Evidence in support of an equal age of consent

- Media coverage (newspapers, online articles and radio)

- The Sodomy Law worsened rather than deleted in October 2008

- A Brief Overview of the Queensland Sodomy Law

- Queensland Anti-Discrimination Commissioner supports reform

- DVD/CD-ROM information pack sent to all Members of Parliament in June 2007

- Premier Anna Bligh evades honest discussion on the Madonna King show ABC612 Oct/Nov 2007

- Parliamentary “E-Petition” July 2005 signed by 740 Queensland citizens, but response is “no plans for reform”

- Definition and Prosecution of the Queensland Sodomy Law

- Former Premier Peter Beattie’s full awareness that the Sodomy Law should never have been enacted

- Contact the Premier and the Attorney-General

- Video interview with John Frame and text statement of his interest in this cause

- Hon. Michael D. Kirby AC CMG statement 3rd February 2010

- Peter Tatchell statement 8th October 2010

 

 

cropped photo of Paul Martin with link to full size 3mb image

(click here for a fullsize 3mb publicity photo)

A statement of support for equal age of consent reform in Queensland

 

by Paul Martin, Principal Psychologist, Centre for Human Potential, Brisbane

 

READ Paul’s complete 18th November 2011 statement as a pdf file

 

Excerpt: I am a psychologist with over 25 years experience specializing in mental health in LGBTI populations. I run a practice which sees many young same sex attracted people and am actively involved in PFLAG where I spend much time with parents of same sex attracted young people. I have worked with parents who have lost their child to suicide as a result of their conflicts around being same sex attracted and young people who were close to dying as a result of suicide attempts. These are extremely vulnerable segments of Australia’s young population.  Clinical and research evidence strongly suggests that the Queensland Sodomy Law which sets a higher minimum age of 18 for anal intercourse not only exposes many of them (any person who engages in anal intercourse) and any of their sexual partners to criminal prosecution, but also causes psychological harm and increases risks of negative outcomes including suicide.”

 

Paul’s conclusion is that:Whilst the Premier’s ‘It Gets Better’ video would have had a positive impact on the mental health of some same sex attracted youth, the impact may be largely negated by her refusal to change discrimination in the Sodomy Law. This law quite clearly causes psychological harm and it is imperative that our Premier acts urgently to change this for the sake of the most vulnerable youth in Queensland.”

Hear Paul Martin interviewed by Doug Pollard on JOYfm, Melbourne’s “Rainbow Report” 2nd Dec 2011

(13 minute, 320kps stereo, 30mb mp3 of the original podcast used by kind permission) (aired 11:30am Brisbane Time, Friday 2nd December 2011).

JOYfm logo   photo of Doug Pollard host of JOYfm's Rainbow Hour Doug Pollard, journalist presenter of the Rainbow Report on JOYfm, Melbourne.

 

READ the article: “Last chance to repeal Queensland’s “toxic” Sodomy Law” (pdf file)

 

“With a looming change of Government to the traditionally homophobic LNP, it is more dangerous than ever to leave such a toxic law in force.”

 

By John Frame, 4th November 2011

 

Quotes from Wendell Rosevear are from John’s interview with him, recorded 18th October 2011 at Avid Reader.

 

On 18th October 2011 Dr Wendell Rosevear OAM made the following video statement in strong support of equal age of consent reform in Queensland. Watch the unedited video below,

Or VIEW an html file with this video embedded, and also the text of the complete transcript:

 

Video recorded at the Avid Reader Bookshop (Brisbane, Australia) 18th Oct 2011 launch of "Speak Now - Australian perspectives on same-sex marriage" (Clouds Of Magellan, 2011). Wendell is one of the contributors to that publication. He is distinguished as one of Australia's most eminent medical professionals who works in Alcohol and Drug recovery, HIV/AIDS, Rape and Sexual Abuse Recovery, and General Practice. Wendell has specialised experience in support for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons, and also in prisoner health and counseling. In 1996 Wendell was named Brisbane Citizen Of The Year and received the AMA National Award for "Best Individual Contribution To Health Care In Australia". In 1998 he was awarded the Order of Australia Medal in recognition of his great work. Wendell believes firmly in the healing power of love. He owns and operates the Stonewall Medical Centre in Newmarket.

 

Queensland’s age of consent is 16, however “sodomy” (a penis entering an anus, or the attempt to do so) involving any person aged under 18, is a criminal offence under the "sodomy law" (Section 208 of the Criminal Code 1899) and is punishable with up to 14 years imprisonment. Queensland is the only state or territory in Australia which does not have a truly equal age of consent (equal at 16 in West Australia, New South Wales, Victoria, Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory, and at 17 in Tasmania and South Australia.)  

So why hasn’t equal age of consent reform been enacted yet? The main problem was that the Queensland Labor Government’s administration – i.e. their Premiers Beattie and Bligh and their last six Attorneys-General, from Matt Foley to Paul Lucas, all apparently cared more about the risk of losing a few votes than they cared about the health and well being of our state’s youth. Support for equality in laws related to age of consent had been written into Queensland Labor’s Policy Platform for many years – so there’s no legitimate excuse for their inaction. Strong resolutions of support for equal age of consent reform had been confirmed in 2010 and 2011 among many branches of the Queensland Labor Party, however the matter was not made an agenda item at their party’s 2011 State Conference.

Another big problem is the dire lack of organised community activism to push for reform. In every other state and territory LGBT groups and community legal services gave due priority to the issue of equal age of consent reform and they fought determinedly to make it happen. LGBT representative groups in Queensland tended to place this issue well down on their list of priorities and it has rarely even been mentioned in their media opportunities or press releases. The Northern Territory’s 2003 case for reform was actioned by the Darwin Community Legal Service, however our Caxton Street Legal Service have advised that they have neither the staff nor the finances to take any action. In June 2010 the Queensland Council for Civil Liberties officially declared its support for reform (emailed pdf letter) and that’s a very important fact to note.

The third problem is that mainstream media, except for local radio ABC612 and national youth network TripleJ, continue to treat this as a “non-issue”. The editor of Queensland’s sole statewide tabloid, The Courier Mail, has flatly refused to publish a feature - even when a very fine article was submitted by one of the paper’s own senior staff. 

 

photo of the Hon Michael Kirby and link to his 3rd February 2010 statement as a pdf file

Photo by Mark Tedeschi QC

3rd February 2010 statement by Hon. Michael D. Kirby AC CMG:

Read:  “Unequal Laws Affecting Homosexual Citizens In Queensland” (pdf file, 40k)

·         Excerpt: “It is time that this last relic of criminal legal discrimination was removed in Queensland. It is a hangover from earlier, ignorant and prejudiced days. It exposes homosexual youth in Queensland to grave differential criminal penalties; potential harassment; and impedes effective strategies to respond in Queensland to the risks of HIV and AIDS in young people. All of the reasons given for the noteworthy decision of the Indian judges apply here. What India and the rest of Australia have already done, Queenslanders should now do by parliamentary action. It is a basic matter of equality of citizenship.”

Michael Kirby retired in February 2009 as a Justice of the High Court of Australia, where he served for 13 years. He is perhaps Australia’s most well known and respected openly gay man and he has been a lifelong active advocate for true equity for all.

Visit Michael’s own site at: http://www.michaelkirby.com.au/

On 8th July 2010 John Frame was in the audience for the "In Conversation with Michael Kirby" event at State Library of Queensland and in Question Time asked Michael to comment on equal age of consent reform. The event was recorded and broadcast 15th July 2010 by Radio National.  Hear that question and answer as a 2m 26s excerpt (2mb mp3).

 

 

In 2011 Michael Kirby wrote an article titledTHE SODOMY OFFENCE: ENGLAND’S LEAST

LOVELY CRIMINAL LAW EXPORT?” for the inaugural issue of the “ASSOCIATION OF COMMONWEALTH CRIMINAL LAWYERS - JOURNAL OF COMMONWEALTH CRIMINAL LAW”. His abstract for that article is:

·         “This article describes the influence of the British Empire on the intercontinental spread of the criminal offences involving adult, private, consensual same-sex activity. It describes the origins of the crimes in Judeo-Christian scriptures and early English common law and statutory offences. The nineteenth century moves for criminal law codification in Europe succeeded in abolishing such offence. They were not a feature of other European empires. However, although codification of criminal law failed in England, five template codes exported the sodomy and other offences to every land ruled by Britain. In 41 of the 53 Commonwealth countries, the offences remain in force. The article describes how they were (often reluctantly) repealed by legislation between 1967-97 in the older dominions. Repeal in newer Commonwealth countries has been slow or non-existent. The author describes new developments that give hope for progress, including the Naz Foundation Case in India (2009) and the recent moves in the United Nations and elsewhere to foster legislative and judicial removal of this unlovely legacy of Empire.”

 

 

Peter Tatchell photo and link to his website (59K)

8th October 2010 statement of support by Peter Tatchell - Australian-born, UK-based human rights and LGBT rights campaigner:

 

"In a democratic society, everyone should be equal before the law. There is no moral or medical justification for having a higher age of consent for anal intercourse. Even though some heterosexuals have anal sex, this unequal age of consent is, in essence, a de facto discrimination against gay and bisexual men. The best way to protect against HIV is education about safer sex, not arbitrary and discriminatory laws that predominantly penalise the gay and bisexual communities."

 

- Peter Tatchell

www.petertatchell.net

 

 

 

The Proposal:

 

That Queensland's Criminal Code be amended to be in line with every other Australian State and Territory through the enactment of a truly equal age of consent to sexual activity, in order to enable equity in the protection and support of all youth regardless of their gender or their sexual orientation.

 

 

 

Reasons for Equal Age Of Consent Reform in Queensland:

 

  • Since 2003 Queensland has been the only Australian State or Territory which does not have a truly equal age of consent. The current law sets a minimum age of 16 for vaginal intercourse, but also sets an unjustified higher age of 18 for "sodomy" - which is defined by the Courts as carnal knowledge through anal intercourse. There is no supportable reason for anal intercourse to be listed as a separate offence to carnal knowledge.

 

  • The current law stands in spite of the October 1990 "Report on Reforms In Laws Related To Homosexuality" by the all party Parliamentary Criminal Justice Committee , as Chaired by Peter Beattie, in which majority Recommendation 7 was that "THE AGE OF CONSENT FOR HOMOSEXUAL ACTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF SEXUAL EQUALITY AND ANTI-DISCRIMINATION BE THE SAME FOR MALES AS IT IS FOR FEMALES, IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER THE SEXUAL ACT IS HETEROSEXUAL OR HOMOSEXUAL.” The higher minimum age for anal intercourse exists only because of a “behind closed doors” decision by the Goss Labor Cabinet, as a token of consolation to its own handful of ultra conservative MPs. It was introduced in the November 1990 Bill which otherwise “decriminalised” sex between men. Hansard shows that not one word was spoken about this section in the passing of that Bill.   

 

 

  • A truly equal age of consent was recommended in the 1999 Report "Sexual Offences Against The Person" by the Model Criminal Code Officers Committee of the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General. They quote from the 1989 Fitzgerald Report: "Laws should reflect social need, not moral repugnance. Unless there are pressing reasons to do so, it is futile to try and stop activities which are bound to continue and upon which the community is divided ... Where the moral issue is one upon which there is room for seriously divergent opinions, the legislature should therefore only interfere to the extent necessary to protect the community, or any individuals with special needs. Generally those who take part voluntarily in activities some consider morally repugnant should not be the concern of the legislature unless they are so young and defenceless that their involvement is not truly voluntary. (Fitzgerald Report, Commission of Inquiry into Possible Illegal Activities and Associated Police Misconduct, Report of a Commission of Inquiry Pursuant to Orders in Council, Government Printer, Brisbane (1989) at 186 ) 

 

  • The current law acts to impede the most effective delivery of vital safe sex education to youth regarding anal intercourse - an activity which, without education for proper protection, may be high risk for HIV infection. On 25th May 2005 Melbourne’s La Trobe University (Dr Lynne Hillier et al) published an important report "Writing Themselves In Again", a national survey of 1,749 “same sex attracted youth”. The researchers found that the clear majority of same sex attracted youth are aware of their sexual attraction by age 16 (if not by 13); that they are sexually active at an earlier age than their heterosexual peers; that 70% had engaged in penetrative sexual intercourse and that only 75% of 15-18 year olds had used condoms in their last encounter. They also found that same sex attracted youth were 5 times as likely to suffer a sexually transmitted infection as would the average high school student – proving their higher risk of exposure to HIV and the drastic need to maximise effective safe sex education.

 

  • The current law acts to reinforce homophobic oppression, bullying and abuse of same sex attracted youth, denying them deserved peer support and acceptance. All youth deserve the same level of legal protection and community support to have the best chance of living healthy, loving and productive lives as adult citizens.

 

 

  • Queensland Labor’s official Policy Platform (Section 7.9 of the Justice and Governance Chapter)  has, since at least 2008, been: "7.9 Labor will ensure uniformity of age among laws relating to the age of consent for lawful sexual activity;"

 

  • As from 1st July 2009, Federal law amendments will define that “couples are couples” regardless of their gender in all areas except marriage. Federal agencies will tell young same sex male couples that they are equal with other couples, while Queensland law continues to define them as criminals. 

 

REFERENCES:

 

The 1990 PCJC Report on Reforms in laws Related to Homosexuality is at:

 http://www.queerradio.org/PCJC_law_reform_report_October_1990.pdf

 

The quote from the Qld Anti-Discrimination Commissioner is from her 15th July 2005 letter to Attorney-General Rod Welford:

 http://www.queerradio.org/AOC150705_ADCQ.htm

 

The Report "Sexual Offences Against The Person" published May 1999 by the Model Criminal Code Officers Committee of the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General. The pdf of the report is at:

http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/rwpattach.nsf/VAP/(03995EABC73F94816C2AF4AA2645824B)~modelcode_ch5_sexual_offences_report.pdf/$file/modelcode_ch5_sexual_offences_report.pdf

and that file is found via the Model Criminal Code listing at:

http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/agd.nsf/Page/Modelcriminalcode_Chapter5-OffencesAgainstthePerson

 

The La Trobe University 2005 Research Report "Writing Themselves In Again: The 2nd national report on the sexual health & well-being of same sex attracted young people in Australia" pdf file is at:

http://www.latrobe.edu.au/ssay/assets/downloads/writing_themselves_in_again.pdf

and that file is found via the list at:

http://www.latrobe.edu.au/ssay/publications.html

 

 

More reasons for urgently enacting a truly equal age of consent in Queensland:

 

 

 

 

Paul Martin, Manager of the Queensland AIDS Council (then known as Queensland Association for Healthy Communities) issued a 3rd February 2005 press release declaring that "The current law causes confusion amongst many in the community who believe that all sex between men is illegal before the age of 18" said Paul R Martin of the Queensland AIDS Council. "We are concerned that young people who are sexually active are reluctant to come forward to access sexual health services and receive sex & relationships education for fear of being prosecuted". Mr Martin went on to say "There is no legitimate reason why the age at which young men and women can have vaginal sex, which may result in child birth, should be any different from the age at which people can legally have anal sex. The current law does nothing to protect young people, on the contrary it criminalises young people who choose to have anal sex".

 

 

 

 

October 2008: Qld's "Sodomy Law" was worsened rather than deleted by Attorney General Kerry Shine in October 2008

 

An October 2008 amendment to the Criminal Code Sections 208 and 209 had actually worsened the effect of the "sodomy law". Section 209 - attempting to engage in sodomy - was deleted and the wording was incorporated into Section 208, which meant that the penalty for attempting sodomy had been doubled from a maximum of 7 to 14 years.

 

Attorney-General Kerry Shine actually reviewed the Sodomy Law element of the Criminal Code and yet decided to make it worse, when he was personally well aware that the Queensland Anti-Discrimination Commissioner had recommended 3 years earlier that it be deleted altogether and she had reminded him, in person, just a year earlier that she was definitely serious about the need for that reform.

 

The Criminal Code and Other Acts Amendment Act 2008  Act No. 55 of 2008 (assented to 23rd October 2008):

http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/ACTS/2008/08AC055.pdf

 

The current version of the Qld Criminal Code is at:

http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/C/CriminCode.pdf  

 

 

 

 

 

Queensland's new Premier, Anna Bligh, declares “no plans to consider” Equal Age Of Consent Reform (ABC612 local radio 26th Oct ’07 and again 30th November '07)

 

On 26th October 2007 Premier Anna Bligh spent just seven seconds on ABC612’s “Madonna King” program dismissing a 19 year old gay Brisbane man’s question on when Equal Age of Consent Reform would happen. I knew that Peter would be calling, so I listened with some hope that our new Premier might have a more compassionate attitude: Hear the audio (30secs, 350k mp3)

 

 

Peter of Taringa was told by the show’s producer that he had to keep his question to the Premier succinct, so he asked:

“I was wondering when the Queensland Government was going to change the age of consent laws between differing sexual activities from 18 for anal intercourse to 16 to be in line with vaginal intercourse?

 

Premier Anna Bligh’s response was:

“Peter, our Government has no plans to consider that issue. So I guess that the answer to your question is that there is no time frame because we have no plans in relation to that.”

 

When I heard this I immediately phoned the ABC in the hope of asking Premier Bligh for exact reasons why her Government is not considering this reform, but I was told that they do not allow callers to ask questions on matters which had “already been dealt with”. I then sent an email to Premier Bligh expressing my disappointment at her display of indifference, and also posing the two questions that she needs to answer in detail. Her 5th December 2007 reply was authored by her Deputy Chief of Staff and continued the "no plans for reform" mantra, without even mentioning the two questions for which I had specifically requested answers.

On 30th November 2007 (click for more details plus link to mp3) I tried phoning in an HIV-related equal age of consent question for Premier Bligh during the Madonna King show – but sadly received a response which was no more satisfactory than Peter's. I believe that Premier Anna Bligh is either feigning or proving her ignorance of the real matters that are at stake with this reform, and that as the mother of a young teenage son it is vital for her to recognise that the current law presents a real potential risk to the health and welfare of her very own family.

 

 

DVD-Video and CD-ROM package “6 Statements of Support for Equal Age Of Consent Reform in Queensland” posted to all MP’s June 2007:

 

 

Click the individual photos below to choose either YouTube video or transcripts of each of these statements of strong support for equal age of consent reform in Queensland:

          

 

 

Since early 2000, when I started to actively pursue this reform, the Premier and various Attorneys-General have all either refused or failed to meet with a representative group in order to discuss the matter. So I decided to bring the people to Parliament via the medium of DVD-Video (with transcripts and audio on an accompanying CD-ROM).

 

I produced the project between February and May 2007 and during June the DVD-Video and CD-ROM package entitled “6 Statements of Support for Equal Age Of Consent Reform in Queensland” was sent to each individual Queensland Member of Parliament. The DVD-Video offers six statements from highly reputable and relevant persons who all support urgent equal age of consent reform, and whose combined statements form a compelling argument.

 

The CD-ROM contains audio versions of the statements, transcripts and also selected relevant documents (including Queensland Anti-Discrimination Commissioner Susan Booth’s 15th July 2005 letter to Attorney-General Rod Welford).

 

Premier Peter Beattie’s written response was that he is continuing to leave the decision on this matter with the Attorney-General (despite Mr. Beattie’s personal 1990 statement that he supported an equal age of consent).

 

The Attorney-General’s 22nd June 2007 response merely re-affirmed the Beattie Government’s ongoing refusal to make any commitment to this reform (while offering no justification for this decision).

Equal Age Of Consent DVD cover art

 

The June 2007 edition of Queensland Pride magazine opened with a page 3 feature article on this DVD project – written by QP’s Editor Iain Clacher:

 

mini image of QP article with link to detailed file(click the image for full text plus link to a full size jpg of the article) 

 

 

 

 

Evidence In Support of an Equal Age Of Consent:

 

There are also valuable references in a January 1991 report from the Australian Institute of Criminology on Homosexual Law Reform in Australia:

http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/ti29.pdf.

 

Report 29 was authored by Melissa Bull, Susan Pinto and Paul Wilson (Professor Paul Wilson is currently Director of the Centre for Applied Psychology and Criminology at Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland) The authors quote professionals who wrote in 1990 to Queensland Premier Wayne Goss stating that it is imperative that age of consent should be gender neutral, and that there be no distinction made in the legality of any consenting sexual activity. The following is a complete excerpt from page 9:

 

 Age of Consent

 

There should be no difference in the 'Age of Consent' for males and females in relation to heterosexual or homosexual acts. The Queensland Psychologists for Social Justice indicated in their submission to the Parliamentary Criminal Justice Committee (Gallois, North & Raphael 1990) that research and clinical experience support the proposition that young males start sexual activity earlier and are more likely to have more sexual partners than girls at any given age through the teenage years.

 

Thus to legislate differently on the 'Age of Consent' for homosexual acts ignores the realities of sexual expression and sexual identity formation. In a letter to the Premier of Queensland, the Honourable Wayne Goss, several Queensland academics argue further:

...that any distinction made in age of consent for homosexual activity and the age of consent for heterosexual activities would be discriminatory and prejudicial...The dangers exist in that any differentiation, in age of consent....further reinforces negative social constructions and public opinion. Such legislative differentiation will ensure that young homosexuals in Queensland will continue to face the monumental task of developing a positive self identity and acceptance of social responsibility in relations to AIDS and public health (personal communication to the Honourable Wayne Goss from Gallois, North, & Raphael 1990).

 

The recommendations regarding 'Age of Consent' finally proposed by the Queensland Parliamentary Criminal Justice Committee concur with these views.”

 

 

June 2006 In a two page briefing paper for members of the Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations (AFAO), the group gives a clear statement of how age of consent laws apply across Australia, and an equally clear condemnation of Queensland's unequal age of consent: http://www.afao.org.au/library_docs/policy/Age_of_consent_briefing_paperJune06.pdf

 

This detailed paper entitled “AGE OF CONSENT FOR SEXUAL ACTIVITY - Findings from the scientific literature to support equality of age of consent for same-sex and different-sex sexual behaviours” was prepared in May 2001 for the Committee on Gay and Lesbian Law Reform (W.A.) by Dr Vivienne Cass, Ph.D., M.Psych., B.Psych., Teach.Cert.  www.queerradio.org/Age_of_Consent_for_sexual_activity.pdf  (27k file)

Source: From the website of West Australia’s Gay And Lesbian Equality ( GALE) www.galewa.asn.au/.

In March 2002 the age of consent in West Australia was equalised at 16 for all genders and for all consenting sexual activities – before that it was a minimum of 21 for any male to male sexual contact. In the lead up to the most recent West Australian election a declared policy of the state Liberal Party was that they would, if elected, raise the homosexual age of consent to 18 (clearly imitating the conservative politics which persist in Queensland). The West Australian Labor Party was returned with an increased majority – proving that the oppression of homosexuality is not a vote winner with a compassionate public.

 



For anyone who might be completely unfamiliar with the story behind the call for reform of Queensland's 1990 Sodomy Law, here's a BRIEF OVERVIEW:

In my home state of Queensland, Australia we have the unfortunate distinction of maintaining our nation's only "sodomy law" - which makes anal intercourse an illegal activity for anyone under 18 (whereas the age of consent for everything else is 16). Any offender faces up to 14 years imprisonment. The law impacts severely on gay and bisexual youth by denying them relevant inclusion in relationships and sexual health education. Experts acknowledge that homosexual sexual activity will happen regardless of the law (and that young males do lots of sex) - and that sodomy laws protect no one, while making some people criminals. The sodomy law also impedes delivery of safe sex education - and our state's HIV infection rates continue to climb.

 

Even though the law applies to "any person" (both men and women) it is clear that the intent of the 1990 law was to discourage young men from doing male to male sex. It was passed in the same Bill which otherwise "decriminalised" sex between men. The lawmakers deliberately used the term "decriminalised" in the legislation to make it very clear that the administration was not inferring any approval of homosexual activity just because they happened to be changing the law. The Goss Labor government of the time had the clear numbers to force any law through, but the Sodomy Law was included in order to placate its own gay-hating conservative Members. All debate in Parliament was about whether homosexual law reform should happen at all. In fact the Sodomy Law has never been debated in Parliament, nor has it ever been officially explained to the public.

 

I got involved in seeking sodomy law reform when, on 19th February 2000, our only state-wide newspaper (The Courier Mail) published a full page article headed ">Reasonable Age - Will lowering the age of consent for homosexual sex open the floodgates to paedophilia?" The article's author clearly thought the answer was "YES!". She dangerously misrepresented the truth of the law by suggesting that ALL male to male sex was illegal under 18 years. I phoned and wrote to the paper and they refused to print a correction or retraction. When I spoke with other people about this I was shocked to find that about 80% (whether straight or gay) did not understand the law.

 

Since 2000 I've had a constant stream of correspondence and phone calls with our state government's Premier and several Attorneys-General, I've organised rallies and meetings, written articles and done radio interviews. 740 citizens joined a Parliamentary E-petition and our Anti-Discrimination Commissioner even wrote stating that the law should be reformed. All this has been to no avail. The Premier simply refuses to budge on reform - even though former Premier Peter Beattie actually Chaired the 1990 all-party Parliamentary Committee which Reported on homosexual law reform. In that Report Mr Beattie declared his personal support for the majority Recommendation to enact an equal age of consent.

 

The Premier and the Attorney-General persist in offering, without qualification, the following inadequate statement to justify their ongoing inaction on reform: “The issue of the age of consent is a vexed one and one in which there are deeply held and opposing views.”

 

Both the Premier and the Attorney-General have refused to meet with a representative community group to discuss the need for an equal age of consent – and they continue to ignore the July 2005 recommendation for reform by the Queensland Anti-Discrimination Commissioner.

 

 

 

Queensland Government Parliamentary E-Petition (Number 421-05) for Criminal Code Law Reform went online on 1st February 2005, sponsored by Simon Finn, MP for Yeerongpilly, with the wording:

TO: The Honourable the Speaker and Members of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland

Queensland citizens draws to the attention of the House the current Queensland Criminal Code discriminates against 16
and 17 year old youth by criminalising one possible sexual activity, anal intercourse, with penalties of up to 14 years gaol.
As a result Queensland youth are denied vital safe sex education regarding this sexual activity. Further, gay and bisexual
youth, in particular are denied peer acceptance and community support because of this law. The age of consent of 16
needs to be applied equally to all Queensland youth to ensure that sexually active people between 16-18 years of age are
able to:

• receive advice and support in relation to a range of sexual activities
• undertake consenting sexual activity without fear of legal penalties.

Your petitioners, therefore, request the House to take action immediately to establish a truly equal age of consent by
removing sections 208 and 209 of the Queensland Criminal Code Act 1899.

The E-petition was open only to citizens of Queensland and it closed on 31st July 2005 with a substantial total of 740 signatories. The E-petition was tabled in Parliament on 9th August and referred to the Attorney-General on the 10th August 2005.

On 22nd  March 2006 an Official Ministerial Response was posted by Queensland Attorney General Linda Lavarch. The Attorney General’s entirely unsatisfactory response acknowledges the negative aspects of the current law, but she advises that the Government will not enact reform because “The issue of the age of consent is a vexed one and one in which there are deeply held and opposing views.” It seems clear from this statement that the Beattie Government cared more about the risk of losing votes than it cared about the health and well-being of youth.

N.B:

In preceding weeks the Courier Mail had reported that Peter Beattie was actively negotiating with the conservative religious Family First Party to secure preference deals for the upcoming state election (hoping to split the conservative vote). Successive polls had shown the Nationals to be almost certain to win at the 2006 election (NB: Labor retained power – at least until the 2012 election). Nationals Leader Lawrence Springborg has clearly stated that they will not support an equal age of consent. 


 

 

QUEENSLAND ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMISSIONER CALLS FOR URGENT SODOMY LAW REFORM:

On 15th July 2005  Queensland's Anti-Discrimination Commissioner Susan Booth wrote to the Attorney-General to confirm an opinion which she had previously expressed face-to-face with Mr Welford: that Queensland’s Sodomy Law “discriminates on the basis of sexuality. These provisions of the Criminal Code are inconsistent with the object of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 to promote equality for everyone and protect them from unfair discrimination, and the premise upon which the legislation was enacted, namely, that everyone should be equal before and under the law and have the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination.”

The Commissioner concludes by stating that “It is now imperative that Queensland remove the age difference for lawful heterosexual and homosexual sex between consenting sexual partners. These legislative changes will ensure that Queensland law is consistent with the International Covenant and local discrimination law, it will reflect contemporary realities of society, and assist in addressing the increase in HIV infections.”

(click here to read the full text of the Commissioner’s letter, including links to jpg scanned images)

Also see the video statement by the Commissioner for the June 2007 DVD/CD-ROM pack sent to all Members of Parliament


 

Definition and Prosecution of the Queensland Sodomy Law:

Queensland’s age of consent is 16, but anal intercourse (“sodomy”) involving any person aged under 18 is a criminal offence under the "sodomy law" (Section 208 of the Criminal Code 1899) - punishable with up to 14 years imprisonment.

Definition of “sodomy”: "Under Queensland Law, "sodomy" refers to the act of carnal knowledge (sexual intercourse) by anal intercourse. In other words, penetration of the anus by a penis." This is a direct quote from a letter by former Attorney General Hon. Matt Foley MP dated 5th September 2000 which further defined details of his letter dated 5th May 2000. Attorney-General Hon. Rod Welford MP confirmed his predecessor’s definition on 21st May 2001 and Premier Peter Beattie also stated his agreement when interviewed on 15th June 2001.

 

How is the Sodomy Law prosecuted in Queensland courts?

Guidelines for the judiciary are contained in the QUEENSLAND SUPREME AND DISTRICT COURTS BENCHBOOK on pages 148, 149 and 150. It is important to note that Queensland Courts specifically do not consider “consent” to be a defence under the Sodomy Law.


 

 

 

 

Queensland's former Premier Beattie (who held office from 20th June 1998 to 13th September 2007) had verifiable first-hand awareness of the need and justification for reform of the Sodomy Law:

Mr Beattie was Chairman of the Parliamentary Criminal Justice Committee (PCJC) which conducted community consultation and delivered a detailed Report to Parliament in October 1990. In the PCJC Report he clearly declares his personal support for the Committee’s first 8 recommendations, of which RECOMMENDATION 7” is “THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT THE AGE OF CONSENT FOR HOMOSEXUAL ACTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF SEXUAL EQUALITY AND ANTI-DISCRIMINATION BE THE SAME FOR MALES AS IT IS FOR FEMALES, IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER THE SEXUAL ACT IS HETEROSEXUAL OR HOMOSEXUAL.” There is no official record of the reason why, but this recommendation was ignored in the Bill which was introduced to Parliament  in November 1990 - a Bill which included a higher age for anal intercourse - a Sodomy Law.

Premier Beattie also knew that the Sodomy Law directly placed 16 and 17 year olds at increased risk of HIV by impeding safe sex information.  His PCJC Report states on page 49:

"The Committee was of the view that the professional advice put before it concludes the following:-

­

1. Sexual orientation is most likely determined early and while the age is not determinable it is most likely before puberty.

 

2. Once sexual orientation is determined it is very difficult if not impossible to change.

 

3. The law regardless of whether it makes homosexual sex between consenting males in private legal or not has little impact or no impact on the practice of homosexuality in private. Its impact is in relation to whether safe sex is practiced and whether the community is susceptible to particular AIDS education programs.

 

4. The evidence seems to suggest that homosexual orientation is not a matter over which homosexuals have any control in the same way heterosexuals have no control over their sexual orientation."

The Queensland Government continues to advise that it does not have any plans to change the existing legislation.


 

 

Contact the Premier and the Attorney-General:

It will be of immense value for you to write your own letter to The Premier and to the Attorney- General (see contact details below) with a copy to your local Member of Parliament. Tell them how you feel about the inequity inherent in the Sodomy Law (Sections 208 & 209 of the Criminal Code) and how it adversely affects your life or that of your family and friends. Ask for prompt action on reform. Be sure to give your name and address so they know that your letter is genuine and so they can send you a reply. Please consider sending me a copy. Post or email the Premier and Attorney-General at:

·         Hon. Anna Bligh MP, Premier of Queensland

P0 Box 185 Brisbane Albert Street
Queensland 4002 Australia
Email ThePremier@premiers.qld.gov.au

 

·         Hon Cameron Dick MP, Queensland Attorney-General

GPO Box 149 Brisbane

Queensland 4001 Australia

Email Attorney@ministerial.qld.gov.au

 

Contact details for all current Queensland Members of Parliament are available via: http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/view/legislativeAssembly/members.asp?area=members&LIndex=1&Subarea=members

 


 

All Media Coverage:

27th Jan 2010 Queensland Pride, February 2010, edition #QP269, cover story feature article:

“STATE OF INEQUALITY” by John Frame

cover art for Queensland Pride February 2010 and link to an html file copy of the online article(click to go to an html file of the online version)

Queensland Pride Queensland Pride logo and link to their websitehttp://queenslandpride.gaynewsnetwork.com.au/ is one of Queensland’s two highly respected and long established lesbian and gay community newspapers.

 

4th December 2009 QNews, edition #235, p9, feature article:

“GAY SEX IN QUEENSLAND – 20 YEARS LEGAL BUT STILL NOT EQUAL” by John Frame

Click here for the QNews online copy of the article

click this small image of the print article to go to a large 700k jpg (click to go to a full size 700k jpg of the print version)

QNews QNews logo and link to their websitewww.qnews.com.au is one of Queensland’s two highly respected and long established lesbian and gay community newspapers.

 

 

 

27th Feb 2009 A recent Queensland Pride Magazine online article inspired ABC Toowong journalist Kaitlyn Sawrey to record an interview at my home for use as a discussion topic on Triple-J's "The Hack" program. That same night they ran the topic as the show's "Shake Up" panel discussion - here's a link to an mp3 of that segment 11 minutes 38 seconds (64kps mono mp3, 5mb) I'm extremely glad that Tommy Murphy (stageplay writer/director of Tim Conigrave's "Holding The Man") was on the panel. Tommy makes very good sense - making up for the regressive comments by conservative christian gay journo John Heard.

 

June 2007 edition of Queensland Pride magazine opened with a page 3 feature article on this DVD project – written by QP’s Editor Iain Clacher:

 

mini image of QP article with link to detailed file(click the image for the full text plus link to a full size jpg of the article) 

 

 

30th Nov 2006 Courier Mail article by feature writer Jane Fynes-Clinton.  In this concise yet accurately detailed feature, especially written for World AIDS Day, Jane connects many of the more important issues related to Queensland’s unequal age of consent – including that the current law places youth at increased risk of HIV infection. She personalises the story with bookended references to Keith Phillips, an openly gay year 10 student at Alexandra Hills State High in Brisbane.

 

20th June 2005 9:20am, ABC 612 Local Radio: Steve Austin interviewed John Frame for 8 minutes (64kps mono mp3, 3mb) regarding the need for Sodomy Law Reform - including mention of the Parliamentary E-petition and the fact that the Northern Territory Labor Government had been returned in the preceding weekend's election with a greatly increased majority (and they had reformed their Sodomy Law in the most recent term of office). The ABC received no calls at all in regard to the interview - a sign that the thinking public is very comfortable with the need for reform.

10th March 2005 “ON LINE opinion” forum article by Rose Cooper on age of consent: http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=3094 . John Frame’s comments were posted under the tag EqualRightsActivist:

“Rose raises many good points - regardless of any nit-picking in regard to her grammar. It is especially important that she points out that there should be no difference in the protection and support afforded to youth of any gender (male/female/intergender) at the age of consent. Anyone with an honest and open mind and with even a smidgen of life experience must know that same gender attraction is NORMAL. It may not be as commonly expressed as opposite gender attraction, but it is no less innate and natural - and seldom "chosen". The only moral "choice" is whether or not to be honest with family, friends and workmates - instead of pretending to be either sexless or heterosexual.

The term "homosexual lifestyle" is as uselessly definitive as "religious fanatic" - but one certainly makes a choice when embracing extremes of fashion or displaying wanton bigotry.

The legal age of consent should be the benchmark for all youth to have access to all information and support that they might reasonably need in order to protect their sexual health as well as their emotional health. All youth should have equal support and protection at the same age. In Queensland, however, we have the only Sodomy Law in Australia and that law effectively blocks the delivery of safe sex education for 16 and 17 year olds. The age of consent is 16, but a separate law bans anal intercourse until 18. The Sodomy Law was enacted when sex between men was “decriminalised” in 1990 and was clearly meant to limit sexual activities for male youth (though it is an equally common heterosexual activity).

Attorney General Rod Welford will tell you that the Sodomy Law is not discriminatory, because it applies to all persons, whether they are male or female – but the Queensland Anti-Discrimination Commissioner says that it is equally wrong that the law discriminates against 16 and 17 year olds. Unfortunately she cannot force reform of State laws and the Beattie Government seems content to let youth remain at risk while they maintain a vote-winning veneer of Bjelke-Petersen style conservatism.”

 

27th Feb 2005 Brisbane’s monthly LGBT street press Queensland Pride publishes an article in their March edition reporting on the 14th February “Love In For Love Equality”. For full article text click here.

 

21st Feb 2005 The Los Angeles based, half-hour weekly, internationally distributed lesbian & gay radio magazine This Way Out included news coverage of the 14th February 2005 “Love In for Love Equality” and also included a 6 minute edit of representative voxpops recorded on that day by John Frame. For full details of this This Way Out program click here.

 

18th Feb 2005 Brisbane’s fortnightly LGBT street press Q News (issue #110, p3) published a substantial article and photo reporting on the 14th February “Love In For Love Equality”.

 

16th Feb 2005 The Queer Radio program on 4ZZZ Brisbane airs over 30 minutes of voxpops recorded at the 14th February Love In For Love Equality – we heard from representatives of the Queensland AIDS Council (Paul Martin, Brisbane Parents Family & Friends of Lesbians And Gays, University of Queensland Sexuality Collective, University of Southern Queensland queer student group “USQ-Plus”, Brisbane LGBT youth service “Open Doors” and Toowoomba’s LGBT social group “The Silver Wheat Society”. HEAR all nine “voxpop” recordings as 128kps stereo mp3’s.

photo of young men and women from USQ-Plus and Silver Wheat Society at the Love-in for Love Equality 13th Feb 2005

 

14th Feb 2005 – approx 5:45pm The ABC’s national youth radio network Triple-J's "The Hack" program aired a 6 minute interview (128kps stereo mp3, 6mb) on the need for reform of the Queensland Sodomy Law. Steve Cannane, Sydney-based presenter of the “Hack” program, spoke by phone earlier in the day with John Frame from the ABC’s Brisbane studios.

 

14th Feb 2005 CLICK HERE for PRESS RELEASE re success of Love In For Love Equality (13th Feb ’05)

 

September 2003 A fine article titled “Sodomy” by Rodney Polkinghorne was printed in the September 2003 “Queer Edition” of Semper Floreat – the monthly magazine published by the University of Queensland Student Union. The article tells the accurate story of Queensland ’s Sodomy Law, past and present, and calls for student support to demand action. It includes an interview with a very reticent representative of the state Attorney General.

 

29th August 1997 a Courier Mail feature article on the unequal age of consent in Queensland titled “Age Barrier”. Writer Matthew Fynes-Clinton sought comments from several people – but only one of them was sensible – i.e. Terry O'Gorman of Qld Council for Civil Liberties, who makes perfect logical sense in favour of a truly equal age of consent at 16. However there are also very dodgy comments from LNP Attorney-General Denver Beanland, as well as from a right wing conservative paediatrician and from an RBH adolescent psychiatrist. I'm disappointed to see the quotes from former (Goss Labor) Attorney-General Dean Wells in which he defends the validity of the Sodomy Law - even if those quotes happen to be from November 1990 – because his "1995 Revised Criminal Code" would have set a truly equal age of consent at 16. I say "would have" because this article was published at the time when the Borbidge LNP held power - and one of their first acts in 1996 was to repeal the 1995 Revised Criminal Code just before it was to officially take effect. The article was prompted by the New South Wales Wood Royal Commission recommending an equal age of consent at 16 in that state - but they did not enact it until December 2003. The October 1990 Queensland PCJC Report on Laws Relating To Homosexuality had also recommended a truly equal age of consent at 16 - which was ignored by Goss Labor. Hansard records of the November 1990 "decriminalisation" Bill debate prove that there was not one word spoken in Parliament either for or against the Bill's proposed higher minimum age for anal intercourse. Queensland has already taken more than three times longer than New South Wales to follow an official recommendation to allow youth equality at the same reasonable age of 16. An image of the Courier Mail article in 150dpi resolution is on my site as a 1mb jpg at:http://www.queerradio.org/CM_19970828_p13_Age_Barrier_MatthewFynesClinton150dpi.jpg and a version with proofed OCR text as a 500k pdf file is at:http://www.queerradio.org/CM_19970828_p13_Age_Barrier_MatthewFynesClinton_OCR.pdf

 

 

 

Video Interview with John Frame and statement of interest in this cause:

 

View YouTube video of John Frame as a guest speaker of the Queensland Association for Healthy Communities at their 4th June 2008 Pride Campaign launch at their Brisbane premises. John is interviewed by Eileen Surepuss about the need for urgent equal age of consent reform in the state of Queensland, Australia.

 

Why is John Frame personally interested in this issue? (19k html text  file)

 

 

 


Linked to the buttons below are: Details of the current Queensland sodomy law; how it adversely affects youth; why it should be removed; full legislation references and history; and full campaign correspondence details.

what the law means...an easy to read pamphlet...a brief story of the campaign so far...the need for community action...homosexual law reform history in Qld...Government legislation referencesCorrespondence Summary List... 

From the website of Queer Radio, the gay & lesbian Community Radio program on 4ZZZ fm102.1 in Brisbane, Australia. File and website maintained by Queer Radio presenter & coordinator John Frame.

Queer Radio homepage Last updated 17th August 2014